Supply Chain Security Vendor Comparison
Patchguard vs. Dependabot · Snyk · Socket · Mend · Renovate · GHAS — Fix Rate, time-to-patch, feature support. All competitor numbers come from public sources only (official stats, product docs, whitepapers). View methodology →
What we do best
AI-native supply chain security platform that generates verified PRs with tested fix code
Average confidence score
63 / 100
Average TTP
~10s
Backend regression test count
953
Compliance report formats
CRA / NIS2 / SOC2 / ISO27001
Visual comparison — at a glance
5-axis radar
SnykDependabot
Per-metric bars (all vendors)
Average confidence score↑ higher = better
63 / 100
not disclosed
—not disclosed
—not disclosed
—not disclosed
—not disclosed
—not disclosed
—Average TTP↓ lower = better
~10s
~3 days
not disclosed
—not disclosed
manual fixnot disclosed
—not disclosed
—not disclosed
—CVE data sources↑ higher = better
5
1 (GHSA)
3 (NVD, GHSA, Snyk)
5+ (own + public)
not disclosed
—not disclosed
—1 (GHSA)
AI fix success rate↑ higher = better
95%
not disclosed
N/A (no AI patch)~50%
not disclosed
N/A (detection-first)~60%
not disclosed
N/A (version bump only)~30%
Supported languages↑ higher = better
25
10+
15+
6
200+
30+
9
Lower-is-better metrics (e.g. time-to-patch) are inverted in both visualisations so longer / further-out always means "better". Full numbers in the table below.
Quantitative Metrics
| Metric | PatchOps Guard ★ | Dependabot | Snyk | Socket | Mend.io | Renovate | GitHub Advanced Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average confidence score ↑ Higher is better | 63 / 100Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Average TTP ↓ Lower is better | ~10sMeasured | — | manual fixNot disclosed | — | — | — | |
| Backend regression test count ↑ Higher is better | 953Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Compliance report formats ↑ Higher is better | CRA / NIS2 / SOC2 / ISO27001Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CVE data sources ↑ Higher is better | 5Measured | 1 (GHSA)Public stat | 3 (NVD, GHSA, Snyk)Public stat | 5+ (own + public)Public stat | — | — | 1 (GHSA)Public stat |
| Typosquat detection corpus ↑ Higher is better | 11,899 pkgsMeasured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Multi-region deployment regions ↑ Higher is better | 3Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Supported package managers ↑ Higher is better | 12Measured | — | 50+Public stat | 90+Public stat | — | ||
| Exemplar patch corpus ↑ Higher is better | 11,500+Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AI fix success rate ↑ Higher is better | 95%Measured | ~30%Estimated | |||||
| Option 4 cumulative commits ↑ Higher is better | 17Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IaC rule count ↑ Higher is better | 1,065+Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Security lane count ↑ Higher is better | 10Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Supported languages ↑ Higher is better | 25Measured | 6Public stat | |||||
| OWASP LLM Top 10 rule count ↑ Higher is better | 17Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Reachability v2 tree-sitter language count ↑ Higher is better | 25Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Re-scan block rate (false positive defense) ↑ Higher is better | 5%Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sandbox isolation level ↑ Higher is better | --network=none --read-only --cap-drop=ALLMeasured | None — no test executionPublic stat | No test execution (advisory only)Estimated | — | — | — | — |
| SAST rule count ↑ Higher is better | 3,200+Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Secret detection pattern count ↑ Higher is better | 1,000+Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RQ worker queue count ↑ Higher is better | 15Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Zero-day radar source count ↑ Higher is better | 5Measured | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Feature Matrix
| Feature | PatchOps Guard ★ | Dependabot | Snyk | Socket | Mend.io | Renovate | GitHub Advanced Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM agent supply chain audit | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| AI code patch generation | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✗ No | △ Partial |
| Programmatic API key management | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Official CLI | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Container image scanning | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Dependency version upgrade PR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | △ Partial | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| EU CRA Article 14 PDF | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| GitHub Checks API integration | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Helm chart (air-gapped) | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| IaC (Terraform/K8s/CFN) scanning | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| LLM Guard (OWASP LLM Top 10) | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Malicious package deep scan | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| MCP server security audit | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ML-BOM (CycloneDX 1.6 mlModelInventory) | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Hugging Face pickle opcode scanner | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Multi-region active-active | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| NIS2 Article 23 mapping | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| OpenTelemetry tracing + metrics | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Official Python SDK | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Reachability analysis (call graph) | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | △ Partial |
| Post-fix re-scan (new vulnerability gate) | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Isolated sandbox test execution | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No | △ Partial | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| SAST (1st-party code, CWE Top 25) | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| CycloneDX SBOM export | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | △ Partial |
| SPDX SBOM export | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| SCIM 2.0 automated provisioning | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Secrets scanning + entropy heuristic | ✓ Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| VS Code extension | △ Partial | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Reproduce locally
Every Patchguard number above can be reproduced from this open repository. No private API, no opaque scoring.
$ git clone https://github.com/liveplex-cpu/patchguard
$ cd patchguard/backend
$ python -m scripts.run_benchmark_200 # full 200-CVE seed corpus
$ python -m scripts.benchmark_repair --vendor=patchguardMethodology — How we collect our numbers
- Fairness — We measure the same category metrics for every vendor. We do not cherry-pick metrics that favor us. If Renovate supports more package managers, we show that as-is.
- Source transparency — Competitor figures come only from official stats, product docs, independent research, or whitepapers. Each cell has a "Source" link for verification.
- Confidence labels — Each figure is labeled as Measured / Public stat / Estimated / Not disclosed to indicate the certainty of its basis.
- Reproducibility — Patchguard figures can be independently reproduced by anyone using
backend/scripts/benchmark_repair.py.
Generated at 6/5/2026, 3:28:33 PM